loading ...
loading ...

17. FDF: National Gallery

He guides us to see art as an interaction between the past and the present, between the art piece and the observer. We see cuts between faces on paintings and the visitors’ faces – which is a very visible parallel between the past and the present.

FILM SEMINAR: MAD ABOUT DOCUMENTARY FILM

An Exhibition of Interpretation in National Gallery

By Ivana Balážová

Ivana Balážová is a student from Slovakia. She studies documentary film directing at VŠMU Bratislava and is currently on exchange at AGRFT.

Let’s ask ourselves a question. What is a gallery? In general it’s a place where we can see great art and sometimes also buy some artefacts like paintings, graphics, or sculptures. That is not an official definition. It is just my view, a view from a person who goes to the gallery maybe two or three times a year. After watching National Gallery (Frederick Wiseman, 2014) that definition of a gallery changed for me. Galleries always seemed like some ordinary institutions, where there is nothing to see under the surface, but Wiseman showed me that there is so much more going on behind that picture.

Even though I am a student and a beginner in the art of documentary filmmaking, I am not afraid to confess that I didn’t know Frederick Wiseman’s work before. Yes, I have already heard about the documentary legend, but National Gallery was where our first official “date” happened. And when I walked home after the screening, I was madly in love. I would also like to add that I don’t like to write (or speak) about any film only in superlatives. But in this writing, you will not find a lot of negative things. Wiseman just didn’t give me any other choice.

national-gallery-2014-frederick-wiseman-04
image-1132

“Close your eyes and try to move to the tiny dark church in 6th century”, the guide encourages visitors of the gallery at the beginning of the movie. For a second maybe, they feel uncomfortable. But then they realize that this is what we can do through art. We can move away from our current reality with the aim of trying to understand it in a new way. After this beginning about interpretation, we then find ourselves in a smaller room. People are sitting around tables. A woman is speaking about art and puts some sketches in front of them. They start to touch these sketches and literary feel the art, and we see that they are blind. This was a moment when I could say “Oh, that is strong!” because it is, but: “What more can Wiseman offer me in next 3 hours?”

w964
image-1133

Don’t worry, I am not going to analyze the film scene by scene. I would just like to point out the dramaturgy of the film in which Wiseman achieves to get a lot of these surprisingly strong moments that don’t make the viewers feel as if they are on a minefield of pathetic sentimentalism. Wiseman serves us a big tangle of topics, emotions, information and impressions. He is playful in his observation and these visual games are balanced with interesting information. In the film we become witnesses to an artistic analysis of social behavior from the beginning of mankind until today. And he looks deeply under the surface.

In the film Wiseman also guides us through the management problems that the director and employees of the gallery are facing. At this point we also get to see a lot of the professions of people working in the gallery, and for most of them we have never heard before. We see a restorer, who takes care of the paintings with specific perfection, very professionally, but also very delicately and softly. You can see how the love for art looks in practice. The pile of information we get is not heavy and it does not make a mess in our head. With slow cuts and long shots Wiseman gives us time and space to think about them and absorb them.

national_gallery_film_still_a_l
image-1134

At the end, I would like to stop for a moment by the statement that the interpretation of art is unbound. This sounds like an old phrase, but is nonetheless true. The film is interlaced with several different interpretations of selected paintings. Gallery curators are trying to explain art to different groups of visitors. In some situations those explanations seem a bit exaggerated constructs of art historians. However, Wiseman, with his playful visual observations, doesn’t allow us to think about it that way. He guides us to see art as an interaction between the past and the present, between the art piece and the observer. We see cuts between faces on paintings and the visitors’ faces – which is a very visible parallel between the past and the present. But these are not just plain similarities, what he shows us are deeply rooted connections between people in the past and the present-day and the power of interpretation of this relation through art. It is his art. And this is his way of talking to us.

14. MAF seminar: Poročilo

Blog, MAF!, Poročila

Novembra so štiri slovenska mesta zaživela s svežim filmskim utripom. 28. LIFFe je ponudil bogat program in vsak je…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Scenarij: Zadnji obiskovalec

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe

V sklopu 14. filmskega seminarja za mlade Enostavno nori na film, ki je potekal na 28. Ljubljanskem mednarodnem filmskem festivalu LIFFe,…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Scenarij: Grozljivi gost

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe

V sklopu 14. filmskega seminarja za mlade Enostavno nori na film, ki je potekal na 28. Ljubljanskem mednarodnem filmskem festivalu LIFFe,…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Oblika vode

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Pravljičasta pravljica Ustno izročilo je v zgodovini človeštva vse do začetka pisanja in tiskanja v večjem obsegu predstavljalo edini…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Intervju s Souleymanom Seyom Ndiayom

Blog, Festivali, Intervjuji, LIFFe

Od Senegala do Slovenije Souleymane Seye Ndiaye je senegalški igralec, ki je na Liffe prišel zaradi filma Mlada ženska….

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Mlada ženska

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Kako biti francoska ženska Paula je Francozinja. To se pravi francoska ženska. Pa ne tiste pregovorne sorte, ki nosi…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Rekviem za gospo J.

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

OPRAVKI ZA SMRT »Obstaja en zares resen filozofski problem: samomor,« je zatrdil Albert Camus. Film Rekviem za gospo J….

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Moški ne jočejo

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Izgubljeni in najdeni Združena Jugoslovanska produkcija pod poveljstvom (generala) režiserja Alena Drljevića je napovedala bitko travmam skupinice, ki jo…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Ubijanje svetega jelena

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Ubijanje slehernega gledalca Tudi letos je na Liffe prišel težko pričakovani, zdaj že drugi angleško govoreči film izjemnega, a…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Dobri časi

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Dobri časi slabega mesta Brata Benny in Josh Safdie, ki bi se ju dalo opredeliti kot indie režiserja, nam…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: V Ciambri

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Zatirani, ki imajo svoje zatirane Zgodnje vstajanje, potepanje čez dan in trudoma nekaj zaslužiti (večinoma s krajo), napeljevanje žic…

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Obupana

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Slaba raziskava neonacističnega nasilja Film Obupana (Aus dem nichts, 2017, Fatih Akin) deluje na dveh ravneh: družinski in družbeni….

Preberi več →

14. seminar MAF: Labod

Blog, Festivali, LIFFe, Recenzije

Otroška melanholija pod perutmi laboda Debitantski film mlade islandske režiserke Labod (Svanurinn, 2017, Ása Helga Hjörleifsdóttir) tako kot večina…

Preberi več →
Back To Top